Durable Headphones Compare
This page is for anyone looking for sustainable headphones and wanting to compare different sustainable headphones. We show how far each brand goes with sustainability and recycling, as well as comparing standard features. Whether you care about sustainability or just want the best headphones, we're here to help. We also explain which measures have high impact and which relatively low.
Possibility of replacing parts
Are broken parts recovered and reused
Are broken parts recycled
How easily replacement parts can be ordered
To what extent recycled materials are used
Battery life
Sound quality (assessed by independent experts)
Possibility to use wired via 3.5mm minijack
Comfort (based on customer reviews)
PRINCE
Repeat
Fairbuds XL
Fairphone
Positive Vibration XL
House of Marley
QuietComfort
Bose
WH-1000XM5
Sony
Possibility of replacing parts medium impact
Modular design plays a crucial role in extending the life of products and is thus an important factor when comparing headphones. By designing electronics with easily replaceable and repairable parts, products can be used for longer and the need to buy new products is reduced. This not only reduces the number of products ending up in landfills, but also saves raw materials and energy needed to produce new devices
Lifetime warranty vs Spare parts sales high impact
Companies offering lifetime warranty:
Companies like Tupperware and Patagonia, which offer lifetime warranties, have a strong incentive to design high-quality products. These companies need to ensure that their products are reliable and durable to minimise the cost of future repairs or replacements. This leads to a focus on high-quality materials and robust design, which extends the overall product life and reduces e-waste.
Companies making money from spare parts:
Companies like Apple and Samsung, which generate revenue from the sale of spare parts and repair services, have a different approach. While they still want to offer quality products, they can benefit from selling replaceable parts. This can lead to designs that are modular and easy to repair, as well as more frequent replacement of parts. This model can contribute to a circular economy by promoting repair and reuse, but it can also result in more waste due to parts replacement.
Recovery and reuse of broken parts high impact
Companies that take back broken parts for repair and reuse, such as HP and Dell, promote sustainability and minimise waste. This model encourages the production of parts that are easy to disassemble and repair. It requires a design approach where products are modular and accessible so that damaged parts can be easily replaced and repaired. This not only contributes to the circular economy, but also reduces the need for new raw materials and reduces the environmental impact of manufacturing processes.
This practice forces manufacturers to design robust and reusable parts, which can result in higher initial production costs, but can lead to cost savings and environmental gains in the long run. Taking back parts allows companies to improve the quality of their products through continuous feedback and innovation based on the most common defects and wear patterns. It also promotes the use of sustainable materials and technologies that are easier to repair.
Reused materials in the initial production process low impact
Using recycled plastic in products contributes to waste reduction and promotes the circular economy. However, its impact remains limited by several factors such as the quality and availability of recycled material and the energy-intensive processes required for recycling. Recycled plastic can be weakened, which can lead to shorter product life and increased maintenance costs.
In contrast, a focus on life extension and closed material flows offers much more impact on sustainability. Designing products for a longer life reduces the need for new raw materials and minimises waste generation. This includes designing products that are easy to repair, upgrade and recycle, resulting in fewer replacements and less waste.
Closed post-use material flows, where materials are fully reused in new products, maximise material utilisation and minimise the carbon footprint. This system ensures that valuable raw materials remain in the production chain, drastically reducing both the demand for new materials and the amount of waste.